The speech of the President of the Confindustria

I would like to summarise the points made by the President of the employers association Confindustria, Luca Cordero di Montezemolo, who was speaking at Confindustria's annual general meeting and to add my comments.
Luca Cordero di Montezemolo’s main points were:
- contain expenditure
- no increase in fiscal pressure
- equilibrium in public financing
- discussions between economic and social players for development
- greater autonomy for companies
- reduction of the tax wedge {taxes paid by employer for each employee}
- keep the Biagi Law but adding in social sweeteners
- development of big engineering works even in the face of local opposition
- deficit of infrastructure in the north and the issue of the North
- encouragement of bank mergers
- privatisation and liberalisation
- fight against tax evasion
- no to the spoils system
- constitutional reforms aimed at modernising the organisation and the operation of public institutions
It’s easy to share many of these aspirations, in particular those relating to the spoils system, limits on public expenditure, the fight against tax evasion, reduction of the tax wedge, and encouragement of bank mergers.
It’s possible to share others only partly, like the development of big engineering works, considered necessary “a priori” without any evaluation in a complex picture of the needs of the country and of the economic possibilities; keeping the Biagi Law without adding in strong correctives arising from principles of solidarity; the privatisation of companies without precise guarantees for citizens at the level of services and employment, so as not to repeat the errors of the past.
Other aspects are absent from the speech of the President of Confindustria. One of these is the Mezzogiorno {the South of Italy}. Without a revival in the South, through the construction of infrastructure, and the return to the rule of law, Italy cannot develop. Furthermore, there seemed to be a lack of self criticism in the speech. Companies cannot totally exclude themselves as responsible for the current difficult economic situation. I refer in particular to the modest investments in terms of innovation and research and to the scarcity of integration between the system of industry and the universities.
Posted by Antonio Di Pietro in
Economy
Comments(1)
| Write a comment
| Sign-up
| Send to a friend
|
Print







Comments
Grande Antonio !
Ancora una volta hai colto nel segno! non si puo' continuare a difendere una legge(Biagi) che ha mostrato e continua a mostrare serissime limitazioni e gravi responsabilita'. Il mezzogiorno e' ormai parola tabu' sconveniente e ingombrante. E' da decenni che lo stato da l'impressione di tenere volontariamente il mezzogiorno e specialmente le isole in un perpetuo e immutato stato di sottosviluppo. Per quanto riguarda universita'/industria /competitivita' beh che dire la situazione e' tragicomica e devo ammettere che e' piuttosto irritante vedere un uomo come montezemolo avere la faccia tosta di affermare : lasciateci lavorare ! ahhaha ma cosa hanno fatto negli ultimi 12 anni? hanno avuto carta bianca su tutto e son riusciti a mandare in rovina pure quei settori che in Italia erano reputati infallibili .
Nel frattempo e' curioso notare come in uno stato di stagnazione e crisi evidente dell'economia Italiana le paghette dei"managers" sono aumentate a dismisura e lo stipendio medio di un operaio ha perso 1/3 del suo potere d'aquisto.
Ma non bisogna disperare d'altronde i ristoranti sono pieni, talmente pieni che per poco il nostro illustre ex capo del governo non trovava posto.
Ma quale crisi ?
Postated by: piero sanna | May 29, 2006 06:02 AM