Public utilities

public_utilities.jpg

The Autostrade affair has opened (re-opened?) a debate about public utilities in Italy. A very important debate that I hope will bring clarity and above all, advantages to Italian citizens who benefit from the services. Privatisation of the utilities must come about in a context in which a de facto private monopoly is not created. In which the development of the market is guaranteed, in which there is a reference framework that protects the users and finally one where there is a controlling Authority with real powers to impose sanctions.
It seems to me that this is not what has been happening in Italy in the last few years. In fact the private monopolies that were previously public have become weaker financially without bringing any particular benefits to the country. This is a situation that has come about through the use of debts in the acquisition of the companies that belonged to the State.
If they are heavily in debt, the companies have objective difficulties in making investments and this is what has happened.
I am not against privatisation. I am not against the market. The opposite is in fact true. But the handing over to private companies of public utilities cannot be reduced to pure economics. When the economy of the country depends on the public utilities, it’s not enough that the dividends of the controlling group are the predominant feature. The industrial and economic development of Italy is conditioned by the public utilities. They must be efficient and competitive while respecting the market, the citizens and the companies.

Posted by Antonio Di Pietro in
Comments(1) | Write a comment | Sign-up | Send to a friend | Print



Comments

I was very disappointed to see how you have handled the Autostrade case and your latest response to the Breaking Views article. I had hoped as a leader of the clean hands movement (for which I had high hopes some years ago), you would be interested in the fair and even application of the law, both Italian AND European law.
Firstly, you have been uneven in your treatment of Albertis/Autostrade, having chosen to ignore the fact that companies with construction interests are already participating in Italian motorway companies.
Secondly, you have chosen to hide behind this Italian law concerning construction companies particpating in motorway concession holders, knowing that this provision is illegal under European law, which prohibits such restrictions on the free movement of capital. As a Member of the European Parliament your disregard for European law is a disgrace.
Lastly, the manner in which you have prosecuted your views about the merger through the media is highly unprofessional and falls short of the standards of ministerial behaviour of any European Government. Your behaviour also risks creating uncertainty for investors. You should not therefore be surprised when journalists such as those at Breaking Views call your behaviour into question.
As the leader of a political party that seeks to promote new and better values in politics, your most urgent task should be to consider your own recent conduct as a Minister of the Italian Government.
Yours sincerely,
Ben Pope, London

Postated by: Ben Pope | August 11, 2006 01:01 AM

 


Rules to comment the articles

Your messages will be published directly.
This is a public space though, there are some rules that need to be attended.

The following are not allowed:

1. messages without the email address of the sender
2. anonymous messages
3. advertising messages
4. messages containing obscene or offensive language
5. messages with racist or sexist content
6. messages with content that constitutes a violation of Italian Law (incitement to commit a crime, to violence, libel etc.)


Post a comment


Name and Surname*:

Your email *:
Anonymous messages will be removed
Your website :



characters left

* Compulsory fields



Send to a friend

Send an email to *:


Your email *:


Message:


* Compulsory fields