Let the politicians put themselves on trial

prescrizione Berlusconi.jpg
I’m publishing an interview I gave to il Corriere della Sera about the possibility of a conviction for Silvio Berlusconi in the judicial proceedings about Mediaset rights.
CdS: Minister Antonio Di Pietro, the President of the Republic is carrying out consultations, there’s the feeling of political elections in the air and they are going back to talking about a trial that sees Silvio Berlusconi as a defendant and how that and the decisions of the magistracy could influence the election campaign.
Antonio Di Pietro: It is significant that everyone is worrying about the prescrizione {time limit to get to the conclusion} of this trial and how to get there as soon as possible. Thanks to the laws approved during the government of the Centre Right this prescrizione will very probably arrive before the trial has ended with the final degree of judgement {the final appeal}.
The basic problem for the country is another one: do we want to have a President of the Council, if Berlusconi were to get there, getting the prescrizione for the umpteenth time or that it is ascertained that he has not committed crimes? No one, even more so the magistracy, could have thought of the collapse of the Prodi government when there was a request for the unification of the two trials.
CdS: From Berlusconi’s lawyers, from Forza Italia and from other political environments however, this is what they are talking about.
Antonio Di Pietro:It is not the work of the magistracy to place conditions on the elections, on the other hand, the elections are an element of disturbance for the trial. It would be good that all those who now are gathering round Berlusconi ask that these two trials come to an end as soon as possible, within a few months and before the election campaign gets lively, so that his full innocence can be verified. And the defendant can be cleared of any shadow of suspicion.
And then, how is it possible to talk about political intervention when we are still in a state of pre-crisis and we still don’t know if there will be an election campaign and elections?
CdS: Is it like saying there’s so much fuss about nothing?
Antonio Di Pietro:So, I repeat, let Berlusconi let himself be tried. It is not even a good thing for him that there are ongoing trials.
I believe that the time has come for the Italian citizens to rebel against this distorted and conditioned information. That they open their eyes and that they ask if the blame for all this is down to the magistracy or to those who commit the actions that the magistrates are then obliged to take an interest in.

Posted by Antonio Di Pietro in
Comments(2) | Write a comment | Sign-up | Send to a friend | Print



Comments

On. Antonio Di Pietro,
I would like to suggest that you should prepare a petition in order to ask the change of our statute of limitation "PRESCRIZIONE".

The statute of limitation should cover a period of time within which the State must take its actions.

Thereafter, no one can can be persecuted (except certain crimes such as homicides etc.that have no statute of limitation)

If a trial starts even at the last day of the statute of limitation, there will be NO PRESCRIZIONE until the trial has been duly concluded by the Magistry.

There will be less lawsuits, less caos.

The State will be able to grant a speedy trial to all.

We cannot continue to live in a civil society to start a trial with the arrogance and incompetence to acquit a defendant because of the statute of limitation.

It is not fair for those who have respect of the law, of the legality.

It is not fair to increase the costs of the State that we have to pay, bottom line!

Sincerely,

Giovanna


Posted by: GIOVANNA ROMANO | January 30, 2008 06:42 PM


On. Antonio Di Pietro,
I would like to suggest that you should prepare a petition in order to ask the change of our statute of limitation "PRESCRIZIONE".
The statute of limitation should cover a period of time within which the State must take its action.
Thereafter, no one can can be persecuted (except certain crimes such as homicides etc.that have no statute of limitation)
But, if a trial starts even at the last day of the statute of limitation, there will be NO PRESCRIZIONE until the trial has been duly concluded by the Magistry.

There will be less lawsuits, less caos.

The State will be able to grant a speedy trial to all.

We cannot continue to live in a civil society to start a trial with the arrogance and incompetence to acquit a defendant because of the statute of limitation.

It is not fair for those who have respet of the legality.

It is not fair to increase the costs of the State that we have to pay, bottom line!

Sincerely,

Giovanna


Posted by: GIOVANNA ROMANO | January 30, 2008 06:40 PM

 


Rules to comment the articles

Your messages will be published directly.
This is a public space though, there are some rules that need to be attended.

The following are not allowed:

1. messages without the email address of the sender
2. anonymous messages
3. advertising messages
4. messages containing obscene or offensive language
5. messages with racist or sexist content
6. messages with content that constitutes a violation of Italian Law (incitement to commit a crime, to violence, libel etc.)


Post a comment


Name and Surname*:

Your email *:
Anonymous messages will be removed
Your website :



characters left

* Compulsory fields



Send to a friend

Send an email to *:


Your email *:


Message:


* Compulsory fields